I read the latest issue of The Economist this week and it had some great ideas about taxes in America. I'm going to share some of them below and then add my own comments as I go along. First, some interesting statistics from the IRS that were shown in The Economist.
There were 4,680 changes to the tax code since 2001. There are four million words in the tax code. Each year, there are three million man-years spent complying with the tax code. 89% of filers pay for help, excluding software. $168 billion is how much money is spent each year on tax compliance. $400 billion is the tax owed but uncollected each year. In 2011, there were 7,000 millionaires who paid no income tax. 16% of small business people think the tax code is fair.
Interesting stats, right? What stuck out to me perhaps the most was that there were 7,000 millionaires to begin with. Apparently I'm just ignorant to how many millionaires we have in this country. Not that there's anything wrong with being a millionaire, I just think they should at least pay income tax for crying out loud.
"Two lawmakers are trying to reform the code: Dave Camp, a Republican, and Max Baucus, a Democrat. Mr. Obama should lend his weight to their efforts. Ideally, they would start afresh with no loopholes and much lower tax rates. Republicans should love this: if Congress were to scrap all loopholes and deductions, it could nearly halve income-tax rates and still raise the same amount of money. Democrats should like it, too: a more efficient tax system would let them pay for the same amount of government with less drag on growth. The snag is that voters define "loopholes" as other people's tax breaks. Their own, they rather like." (The Economist, p13, May 25th-31st, 2013.)
I love that! Voters think everyone else is getting away with too many loopholes, but the ones they have they rather like. How funny and true is that?! I love the idea of scrapping all loopholes and deductions personally so we could halve income tax-rates. I don't know that we should halve it necessarily though since we're still in a huge deficit, although it is now projected to be roughly half of what it was the past four years. Yes, this means even the tax deductions that I get, which is pretty much for my charitable donations. Even with just that though, I was able to save a ton on my taxes. It would be better I think to have more money in my pocket to begin with though so I could give more. My dad doesn't agree with this at all as it incentivizes private giving, but I say do away with that. All the other deductions as well need to go. Like the mortgage interest rate, etc. People would hate that of course, but maybe we could at least do it on second homes, right?
If we simplified the tax code, there would be some consequences that would be painful. For one, a lot of people would be out of jobs. IRS people and tax professionals who help put taxes together would surely not be needed nearly as much because it would be a very simple code to understand and everyone could figure out how to do it. I don't know though, maybe we could retrain those people for some other job. Or the tax professionals could join the IRS people to make sure people were paying their taxes. I know everyone hates audits and such but think of how many people get away with not paying their taxes because they take the risk of not getting caught.
So, there you have it, a fairly simple and straightforward answer to tax reform. One that will never pass Congress to be sure, but it seems fairly logical to me. The same could go for businesses, simplify the tax code, take away the loopholes and lower their tax rate as well.
As far as tax justice goes, I strongly believe in a progressive tax rate. Someone commented on my facebook post earlier that they would gladly give up their tax deductions if it was replaced with a flat tax. I've never understood a flat tax. You're going to charge millionaires the same percentage as people who make $50,000? How does that make sense? You simply would not collect enough taxes that way. I'm a Christian so I believe in a 10% tithe across income levels, but taxes are different. Not that it should be a crazy high percentage, but I definitely believe there should be tax brackets and that the more income you make the higher taxes you should pay. CEO's now make hundreds of times more than the average floor worker whereas in the 80's they made 30 to 40 times more than the average floor worker. If they don't want to pay higher taxes, than they should give up some of their salary to pay their employees more. I'm not saying the exact same, just a more understandable one. Like somewhere closer to the levels in the 80's or even less than that. I know one CEO who doesn't make more than 10 times his floor workers and he seems to be doing just fine on his salary.
Just some ideas, feel free to share any opinions, I welcome them all.